Diogu Kalu Diogu II v. Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, Fort Bend County Tax Assessor Collector, and Fort Bend Appraisal District Appeal from 240th District Court of Fort Bend County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 28, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-15-00169-CV DIOGU KALU DIOGU II, Appellant V. LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR & SAMPSON, FORT BEND COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR COLLECTOR, AND FORT BEND APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellees On Appeal from the 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13-DCV-203712 MEMORANDUM OPINION On February 27, 2015, Diogu Kalu Diogu II filed a notice of appeal from an order signed on or about January 22, 2015, denying the application filed by plaintiffs, Mary Shavers, et al., to release funds.1 To date, our records show that 1 The notice of appeal states that Diogu Kalu Diogu II, counsel for the plaintiffs below, is the appellant. Without a record from the trial court, we cannot determine whether it was intended for the plaintiffs below, Mary Shavers, et al., to appeal. appellant has neither established indigence nor paid the $195.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov’t Code ' 51.207 (same). On March 17, 2015, this court notified appellant that the filing fee was past due and the appeal was subject to dismissal unless the fee were paid February 12, 2015. No response was filed. In addition, no clerk’s record has been filed in this appeal. On March 27, 2015, the clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. On March 30, 2015, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record or filed any other response to this court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
