Jose Antonio Banda v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 230th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 17, 2012. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-12-00189-CR NO. 14-12-00190-CR ____________ JOSE ANTONIO BANDA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 230th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 1306394 & 1306395 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant entered a plea of guilty to two counts of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. In both cases, appellant and the State agreed that appellant's punishment would not exceed confinement in prison for more than twenty-five (25) years. In accordance with the terms of this agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on January 26, 2012, to confinement for twenty (20) years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice in each case. The sentences were ordered to run concurrently. In both cases, appellant filed a timely, written notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeals. In both cases, the trial court entered a certification of the defendant's right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case and the defendant has no right of appeal. Accordingly, we have no jurisdiction over these appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). An agreement that places a cap on punishment is a plea bargain for purposes of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2). Waters v. State, 124 S.W.3d 825, 826-27 (Tex. App. -- Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. ref'd) (holding reviewing court lacked jurisdiction where defendant pled guilty with a sentencing cap of ten years, even though trial judge mistakenly certified defendant had right of appeal); Threadgill v. State, 120 S.W.3d 871, 872 (Tex. App.-- Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no. pet.) (holding statement in record indicating that there was no agreed recommendation did not convert proceeding into an open plea where plea was entered pursuant to agreed sentencing cap); see also Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (stating sentence-bargaining may be for recommendations to the court on sentences, including a recommended cap on sentencing). In each case, because appellant's plea was made pursuant to a plea bargain, he may appeal only matters raised by a written pre-trial motion or with the trial court's permission. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). In both cases the record does not contain any pre-trial rulings and the trial court did not grant permission to appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss both appeals. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jamison. Do Not Publish - Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
