In Re Erick Lawson--Appeal from 176th District Court of Harris County

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed November 18, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-10-01060-CR ____________ ERIK LAWSON, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 176th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1243460 MEMORANDUM OPINION On October 29, 2010, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator complains that respondent, the Honorable Shawna Reagin, presiding judge of the 176th District Court of Harris County, has denied his motion for hybrid representation. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show that he has no adequate remedy at law to redress his alleged harm, and what he seeks to compel is a ministerial act, not involving a discretionary or judicial decision. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig.proceeding). Because there is no absolute right to hybrid representation, a trial court's ruling on such representation is not a ministerial act but discretionary. See Ganther v. State, 187 S.W.3d 641, 648 (Tex. App. -- Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, pet. ref'd) (citing Montgomery v. State, 810 S.W.2d 372, 391 (Tex.Crim.App.1990)). Accordingly, we deny relator s petition for writ of mandamus. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Boyce, and Christopher. Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.