Jonathan Ryan Jackson v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 209th District Court of Harris County

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 25, 2008.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-07-00609-CR

____________

JONATHAN RYAN JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 209th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1045030

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury convicted appellant of aggravated robbery and sentenced him to confinement for twelve years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a notice of appeal.

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-12 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than sixty days has elapsed and no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed September 25, 2008.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson,, and Frost.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P.47.2(b).