Lambert's Trash Hauling, Inc. and Paul C. Lambert v. Financial Federal Credit, Inc.--Appeal from Co Civil Ct at Law No 4 of Harris County

Annotate this Case
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 30, 2007

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 30, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-07-00419-CV

____________

LAMBERT=S TRASH HAULING, INC. and PAUL C. LAMBERT, Appellants

V.

FINANCIAL FEDERAL CREDIT, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 849838

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal from a default judgment signed April 11, 2006. Appellant filed an untimely motion to set aside the judgment on March 14, 2007. Appellant=s notice of appeal was filed May 14, 2007.

The notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed when appellant has not filed a timely motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion to reinstate, or request for findings of fact and conclusion of law. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1


Appellant=s notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by rule 26.1, but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617-18 9 (1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C); Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617-18. Appellant=s notice of appeal was not filed within the fifteen-day period provided by rule 26.3

On July 30, 2007, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant filed no response to the motion. We grant appellee=s motion.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed August 30, 2007.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Seymore, and Guzman.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.