Roman, Ernest v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 178th District Court of Harris County
Annotate this CaseAffirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed August 17, 2004.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
_______________
NO. 14-03-00404-CR
_______________
ERNEST ROMAN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
_________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 178th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 913,969
_________________________________________________
C O N C U R R I N G O P I N I O N
In essence, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant=s motion to recuse because: (1) Judge Harmon testified at the recusal hearing that he could consider the full range of punishment; and (2) the evidence was undisputed that he had consistently told the parties that he could do so.[1] Moreover, the comments relied upon by appellant (to show that Judge Harmon would not consider the full range of punishment) reflected only that he thought he would be less lenient than a jury in sentencing, but not that he could not, or would not, consider the full range of punishment in whatever sentencing decision he made. I thus believe it is unnecessary (at best) to determine that Judge Harmon was biased at all, let alone whether as contemplated by case law or from non-judicial sources.[2]
/s/ Richard H. Edelman
Justice
Judgment rendered and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed August 17, 2004.
Panel consists of Justices Fowler, Edelman, and Seymore. (Fowler, J., majority.)
[1] See, e.g., Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co., 84 S.W.3d 198, 211 (Tex. 2002) (noting that a trial court does not abuse its discretion if some evidence reasonably supports its decision).
[2] See Tex. R. App. P. 47.1 (requiring court of appeals opinions to be as brief as practicable to address the issues necessary to disposition of the appeal).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.