Davis, Broderick Earl v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 268th District Court of Fort Bend County

Affirmed and Opinion filed November 6, 2003.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-03-00310-CR

NO.  14-03-00447-CR

____________

BRODERICK EARL DAVIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 32,865A & 32,867A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered guilty pleas to two aggravated robbery offenses. On February 24, 2003, the trial court sentenced appellant in each case to confinement for thirty-five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal for both cases.

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed briefs in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

Copies of counsel=s briefs were delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate records and file pro se responses. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). To date, no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the records and counsel=s briefs and agree the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the records. A discussion of the briefs would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.

Accordingly, the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed November 6, 2003.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Anderson and Seymore.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).