Esther Anderson, As Successor Administratrix of the Estate of Shelby E. Snow, Jr., Amanda Womack, as Next Friend of Chelsea Nicole Snow, Delores Stringham Snow, SHelby E. Snow Sr., and Marlene Dennison v. AMF Bowling Products, Inc., AMF Bowling Centers, Inc., Alpha Bowl and/or AMF Alpha Lane #415--Appeal from Probate Court No 1 of Harris County

Annotate this Case
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 22, 2003

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 22, 2003.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-01-00218-CV

____________

ESTHER ANDERSON, AS SUCCESSOR ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF SHELBY E. SNOW, JR., AMANDA WOMACK AS NEXT FRIEND OF CHELSEA NICOLE SNOW, DELORES STRINGHAM SNOW, SHELBY E. SNOW, SR., and MARLENE DENNISON, Appellants

V.

AMF BOWLING PRODUCTS, INC., AMF BOWLING CENTERS, INC., ALPHA BOWL, and AMF ALPHA LANE #415, Appellees

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 298,279-402

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed November 30, 2000. On August 31, 2001, appellee, AMF Bowling Products, Inc., filed a petition for bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court of the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division. Upon notification of this filing, this court issued an order on September 6, 2001, staying all proceedings in the appeal and ordering the cause abated.


On May 13, 2003, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal because a settlement agreement has been reached by appellees and appellants, Esther Anderson, as Successor Administratrix of the Estate of Shelby E. Snow, Jr., Amanda Womack as next friend of Chelsea Nicole Snow, Delores Stringham Snow, and Shelby E. Snow, Sr. Appellant Marlene Dennison no longer wishes to pursue this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. We lift the stay entered on September 6, 2001, and grant the joint motion.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed May 22, 2003.

Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Seymore, and Guzman.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.