In the Interest of U.P. , a Child--Appeal from 328th District Court of Fort Bend County
Annotate this CaseMotion for Rehearing Overruled; Opinion of January 23, 2003 Withdrawn; Affirmed and Opinion on Motion for Rehearing and Concurring Opinion filed April 17, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-02-00126-CV
____________
IN THE INTEREST OF U.P., A CHILD
_________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 328th District Court
Fort Bend County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 115,213
_________________________________________________________________
C O N C U R R I N G O P I N I O N
Applying the standards of review recently announced by the Texas Supreme Court, the record contains legally and factually sufficient evidence to support the trial court s findings that appellant engaged in conduct that endangered U.P. s physical or emotional well-being and that termination of appellant s parental rights is in U.P. s best interest. See Tex. Fam. Code. 161.001; In re J.F.C., S.W.3d , 46 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 328, 332 35, 2002 WL 31890913, at *5 *7 (Dec. 31, 2002); In re C.H., 89 S.W.3d 17, 25 26 (Tex. 2002); Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367, 371 72 (Tex. 1976) (promulgating a nonexclusive list of factors that may be considered when determining the best interest of the child). Appellant did not preserve error as to his fifth and sixth points by asserting these complaints and obtaining a ruling in the trial court. See Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(a). Though I do not join in the majority s analysis, I concur in the court s judgment.
/s/ Kem Thompson Frost
Justice
Judgment rendered and Concurring Opinion filed April 17, 2003.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson, and Frost.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.