In re Yoltzin Mariella Hollibaugh Appeal from 246th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued April 18, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00662-CV ——————————— IN RE YOLTZIN MARIELLA HOLLIBAUGH, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator Yoltzin Mariella Hollibaugh filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging a temporary order entered by the trial court on August 25, 2023. 1 The temporary order was entered in a modification suit and prevented relator from moving with the minor child to Mexico. On December 1, 2023, real party in interest David Michael Wise filed a motion to dismiss the mandamus petition as 1 The underlying case is In the Interest of [name redacted], A Child, cause number 2018-00554, pending in the 246th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Angela Harrington presiding. moot. On December 4, 2023, Wise filed an amended motion to dismiss. Wise stated in the motion’s certificate of conference that, after conferring with relator’s counsel, he understood that relator’s counsel and the amicus attorney agree with the motion. No opposition to the motion to dismiss was filed. A case becomes moot if there is no longer “a justiciable controversy between the parties—that is, if the issues presented are no longer ‘live,’ or if the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.” Heckman v. Williamson Cty., 369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex. 2012). “If a proceeding becomes moot, the court must dismiss the proceeding for want of jurisdiction.” In re Salverson, No. 01-1200384-CV, 2013 WL 557264, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 14, 2013, orig. proceeding) (citing Heckman, 369 S.W.3d at 162)). Wise states that the trial court held a trial of the underlying case from November 6–8, 2023 and rendered a ruling as shown by the attached docket sheet. Moreover, the Court notes that relator has now filed an appeal from the trial court’s final judgment signed on January 3, 2024. We grant the motion and dismiss the mandamus petition. Any other pending motions are also dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Countiss, and Rivas-Molloy. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
