In re Derrick Lee Thomas Appeal from 262nd District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued October 13, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00786-CR ——————————— IN RE DERRICK LEE THOMAS, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Derrick Lee Thomas, has filed a “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Bond Reduction,” contending that he is being unlawfully confined and restrained and the required bail is excessive.1 Relator seeks issuance of a writ of 1 Relator’s petition identifies the underlying cause as Derrick Lee Thomas v. The State of Texas, cause number 1386629, in the 262nd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Denise Bradley, presiding. This Court’s records reflect that a jury found relator guilty of the felony offense of possession of a controlled substance, namely cocaine, weighing less than one gram, and the trial habeas corpus and an order discharging him from custody, or a reduction in the amount of the bond. This Court does not have “original habeas corpus jurisdiction of a bail issue” in a criminal case. Ortiz v. State, 299 S.W.3d 930, 932 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2009, no pet.) (citing TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (Vernon 2004); Ex parte Enriquez, 2 S.W.3d 362, 363 & n.1 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.)); see Ex parte Barnes, No. 03-13-00429-CV, 2013 WL 3723333, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin July 12, 2013, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (dismissing for want of jurisdiction application for writ of habeas corpus seeking release or reduction in appeal bond when relator was convicted of felony offense of aggravated assault). In criminal matters, our habeas corpus jurisdiction is appellate only, and we do not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction. Ex parte Denby, 627 S.W.2d 435, 435 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1981, orig. proceeding); see also Chavez v. State, 132 S.W.3d 509, 510 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.) (citing TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004)) (“A court of appeals does not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction in felony cases.”) Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction. court assessed his punishment at confinement for five years. See Thomas v. State, No. 01-14-00332-CR, 2015 WL 5076292, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 27, 2015, no. pet. h.). 2 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Brown. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
