Betty Jo Taylor and William M. Taylor v. Harris County --Appeal from Co Civil Ct at Law No 4 of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued September 13, 2012 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-12-00158-CV BETTY JO TAYLOR AND WILLIAM M. TAYLOR, Appellants V. HARRIS COUNTY, Appellee On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 995209 MEMORANDUM OPINION The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal, requesting that the Court render judgment effectuating the parties settlement agreement. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1, which governs voluntary dismissal in civil cases, provides, in pertinent part, that an appellate court may, [i]n accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk, . . . render judgment effectuating the parties agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). In accordance with Rule 42.1, the parties have filed with the Clerk of this Court a signed agreement that states as follows: Appellants Betty and William Taylor shall pay the sum of $1,200 by 5:00 p.m. on August 31, 2012, in full and final settlement of this matter. Appellants shall be given one notice of default via certified mail with a 10-day opportunity to sure (from the date of the notice) should the settlement funds not be received by August 31, 2012. Should Appellants fail to make the settlement payment by August 31, 2012, or cure after one 10-day notice of default, then the judgment previously signed by the trial court on November 8, 2011, shall be given full force and effect. A release of judgment will be provided once the settlement funds (of the full judgment amount, if applicable) have cleared. Accordingly, we grant the motion and render judgment effectuating the parties agreement. See id. No opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
