Christine Nunley-Jolivette v. Lyondell Chemical Company--Appeal from 295th District Court of Harris County

Annotate this Case

Opinion issued November 15, 2007

 

 

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

 

NO. 01-07-00523-CV

 

CHRISTINE NUNLEY-JOLIVETTE, Appellant

 

V.

 

LYONDELL CHEMICAL COMPANY, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2005-51766

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 19, 2007, appellant, Christine Nunley-Jolivette, gave notice that she was appealing the trial court's March 20, 2007 order granting appellee, Lyondell Chemical Company, a summary judgment. On July 2, 2007, the trial court sustained the district clerk's contest to Nunley-Jolivette's affidavit of indigence. On July 5, 2007, Nunley-Jolivette filed in the trial court a motion for it to reconsider her affidavit of indigence.

On August 7, 2007, the Clerk of this Court sent Nunley-Jolivette a letter advising her that she had not paid all the required fees in the case and that unless by August 27, 2007 she had done so or filed a meritorious response in writing explaining why she was exempt from the payment of the fees, her case was subject to dismissal. On August 27, 2007, Nunley-Jolivette filed with this Court a letter stating that she was still trying to get financial assistance and that she had not received any information regarding her request for the trial court to reconsider her affidavit of indigence.

August 27, 2007 and considerable time since then has passed. Nunley-Jolivette has not paid the required fees nor filed a meritorious response explaining why she is exempt from payment of the required fees. We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). All pending motions are denied.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Jennings, and Keyes.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.