Jarvis Jarrell Dugas v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 209th District Court of Harris County
Annotate this CaseOpinion issued November 9, 2006
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-06-00945-CR
____________
JARVIS JARRELL DUGAS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 209th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 971007
MEMORANDUM OPINION
We lack jurisdiction to hear this appeal. The trial court sentenced appellant, Jarvis Jarrell Dugas, and signed a final judgment in this case on August 9, 2006. Appellant did not file a motion for new trial, and therefore the deadline for filing a notice of appeal was September 8, 2006, 30 days after sentencing. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).
Appellant filed a notice of appeal on October 9, 2006, 31 days after the deadline. The notice of appeal was deposited in the mail on October 6, 2006, according to the postmark on the copy of the envelope included in the clerk s record. Because the notice of appeal was mailed after the filing deadline, it did not comply with Rule 9.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the mailbox rule. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b)
An untimely notice of appeal fails to vest the appellate court with jurisdiction to hear the case. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 209-10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Douglas v. State, 987 S.W.2d 605, 605-06 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.).
We therefore dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Jennings, and Higley.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.