Emanuel Aguilar v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 338th District Court of Harris County

Opinion issued July 27, 2006

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

NOS. 01-05-00776-CR

01-05-00777-CR

____________

EMANUEL AGUILAR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 338th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1008369 and 1003404

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Emanuel Aguilar, pleaded guilty to a jury to two separate felony offenses of aggravated robbery. The jury found the defendant guilty of each offense and assessed punishment at confinement for seven years in trial court cause number 1008369 and 13 years in trial court cause number 1003404. We affirm.

Appellant s court-appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds of error to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Moore v. State, 845 S.W.2d 352, 353 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref d).

The brief states that a copy was delivered to appellant, whom counsel advised by letter of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel s brief. We find no reversible error in the records, and agree that the appeals are wholly frivolous.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court in each case. //

Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Taft, Higley, and Bland.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).