Darryl James Leblanc v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 185th District Court of Harris County

Opinion issued July 27, 2006

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01-05-00917-CR

____________

DARRYL JAMES LEBLANC, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1007120

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Darryl JamesLeblanc, was convicted by a jury of the felony offense of indecency with a child, and after a hearing at which appellant pleaded true to two enhancement paragraphs, the jury assessed punishment at confinement for thirty years. We affirm.

Appellant s court-appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief concluding that this appeal is without merit. Counsel s brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record that demonstrates the lack of arguable grounds of error. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Moore v. State, 845 S.W.2d 352, 353 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref d).

Counsel represents that she served a copy of the brief on appellant. Counsel also advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel s brief. We find no reversible error in the record, and agree that the appeal is without merit. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We grant counsel s motion to withdraw. // See Stephens v. State, 35 S.W.3d 770, 771 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, no pet.).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Alcala, and Bland.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).