Jaime E. Castaneda, Jr. v. A. Robert Hinojosa, et al--Appeal from 257th District Court of Harris County

Annotate this Case
Opinion issued November 27, 2002

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

 

NO. 01-02-00940-CV

____________

 

JAIME E. CASTANEDA, JR., Appellant

 

V.

 

A. ROBERT HINOJOSA, JUDGE LINDA MOTHERAL, AND FRANK FREEMAN, Appellees

 

On Appeal from the 257th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2000-15225

 

O P I N I O N

On August 30, 2002, Appellant filed a notice of appeal attempting to appeal from temporary custody orders entered by the trial court on August 30, 2002. Appellant did not pay the filing fee or file an affidavit of indigence in the trial court with or before his notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(c)(1). On October 8, 2002, we ordered appellant to pay his filing fee within 15 days or the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no filing fee has been received by the clerk of this Court.

Because appellant failed to pay the filing fee as ordered by the Court on October 8, 2002, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. However, the Court notes that, even had appellant paid his filing fee or timely filed an affidavit of indigence, temporary orders in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship are not subject to interlocutory appeal. Tex. Fam. Code Ann. 105.001 (Vernon 2002). Also, we are advised by the district court clerk that, on November 15, 2002, appellant filed a notice of appeal, accompanied by an affidavit of indigence, from a judgment signed on October 16, 2002. That notice of appeal has been docketed by the clerk of this Court under case number 01-02-01234-CV, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Maria Castaneda and Jaime E. Castaneda, Jr. and in the Interest of Gabriela Castaneda and Jacob Castaneda, Children. Case number 01-02-01234-CV remains pending in this Court.

This appeal is dismissed. All pending motions are overruled as moot.PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Jennings, and Radack.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.