Amy E. Edwards v. Dalcor Skyline Ltd. d/b/a Skyline Appeal from County Court at Law No. 5 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed October 30, 2023 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01000-CV AMY E. EDWARDS, Appellant V. DALCOR SKYLINE LTD. D/B/A SKYLINE, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-03182-E MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Molberg We reinstate this appeal. This case was abated on January 17, 2023 due to bankruptcy. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. The Court conducted an independent review of the federal Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system which shows the bankruptcy case associated with this appeal was terminated on January 20, 2023, effectively dissolving the automatic stay. We notified the parties by letter, requesting they inform the Court of the status of the bankruptcy and of this appeal.1 We cautioned that the failure to respond would result in the appeal being dismissed for want of prosecution. To date, neither party has responded. Because we gave the parties an opportunity to show why we should not dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and no one responded, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c). 221000f.p05 /Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE 1 All correspondence to Ms. Edwards after Nov. 22, 2022 has been returned to the Court. Ms. Edwards has not provided the Court with an updated address. –2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT AMY E. EDWARDS, Appellant No. 05-22-01000-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-03182E. Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg. Justices Pedersen, III and Nowell participating. V. DALCOR SKYLINE LTD. D/B/A SKYLINE, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Judgment entered this 30th day of October, 2023. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.