Lynnette Edic v. Teresa Ariaz Appeal from 191st Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed October 30, 2019 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00960-CV LYNNETTE EDIC, Appellant V. TERESA ARIAZ, Appellee On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-17741 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Whitehill, and Justice Molberg Opinion by Chief Justice Burns The clerk’s record in this case is past due. By letter dated October 8, 2019, we informed appellant that the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or written documentation that appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs within ten days. We cautioned appellant that the failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed, and appellant has failed to provide the required documentation or otherwise correspond with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). 190960F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT LYNNETTE EDIC, Appellant No. 05-19-00960-CV On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-17741. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns, Justices Whitehill and Molberg participating. V. TERESA ARIAZ, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee TERESA ARIAZ recover her costs of this appeal from appellant LYNNETTE EDIC. Judgment entered October 30, 2019 –2–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.