In Re: Ashley Pardo and Daniel Pardo, Individually and as next friend for K.D.P.. a minor Appeal from 422nd Judicial District Court of Kaufman County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Denied; Opinion Filed August 21, 2019. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00911-CV IN RE A.P. AND D. P., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS FOR K.D.P., A MINOR, Relators Original Proceeding from the 422nd Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 102717-CC MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Myers Before the Court is relators’ petition for writ of mandamus seeking to have our Court vacate the trial court’s July 24, 2019 temporary orders and compel the trial court to return their child, K.D.P., to their custody. To be entitled to mandamus relief, relators must show that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relators have no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and mandamus record, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought). /Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE 190911F.P05 –2–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.