In The Interest of C.E.B., A Child Appeal from 256th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 27, 2019 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00648-CV IN THE INTEREST OF C.E.B., A CHILD On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-05080 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Nowell Opinion by Chief Justice Burns The filing fee and docketing statement in this case are past due. By postcard dated May 31, 2019, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated May 31, 2019, we notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so might result in dismissal of this appeal. On August 1, 2019, we sent a second fee request to appellant. We again directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b)(c). /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE 190648F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT IN THE INTEREST OF C.E.B., A CHILD On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-05080. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Molberg and Nowell participating. No. 05-19-00648-CV In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Judgment entered August 27, 2019 –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.