Lesley Templeton v. Blake Patterson Appeal from County Court at Law No. 5 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed November 4, 2015 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00472-CV LESLEY TEMPLETON, Appellant V. BLAKE PATTERSON, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-06506-E MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Myers Opinion by Justice Bridges Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated September 02, 2015, we notified appellant the time for filing her brief had expired. We informed appellant to file both her brief and an extension motion within ten days that complies with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a) and 10.5(b). Appellant was cautioned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed her brief, requested an extension of time to file her brief, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Furthermore, by postcards dated April 14, 2014 and July 29, 2015 we notified appellant that the $195 filing fee was due. On both occasions, we directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and cautioned that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b)(c). 150472F.P05 /David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT LESLEY TEMPLETON, Appellant No. 05-15-00472-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-06506-E. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Justices Francis and Myers participating. V. BLAKE PATTERSON, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. We ORDER appellee BLAKE PATTERSON recover his costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant LESLEY TEMPLETON. Judgment entered November 4, 2015. –3–
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
