Jeremy Demone Williams v. The State of Texas Appeal from 194th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed September 25, 2015. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01483-CR JEREMY DEMONE WILLIAMS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10-30956-M MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Evans, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Lang Jeremy Demone Williams appeals his conviction, following the adjudication of his guilt, for burglary of a habitation. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.02(a)(1) (West 2011). The trial court assessed punishment at five years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. / Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 141483F.U05 -2- Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT JEREMY DEMONE WILLIAMS, Appellant No. 05-14-01483-CR Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F10-30956-M). Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices Evans and Whitehill participating. V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is AFFIRMED. Judgment entered this 25th of September, 2015. -3-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
