Miguel Arnoldo Peralta v. The State of TexasAppeal from Criminal District Court No. 1 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed June 18, 2014. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00955-CR No. 05-13-00956-CR MIGUEL ARNOLDO PERALTA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F06-15900-H, F13-12202-H MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Fillmore, Evans, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Lewis Miguel Arnoldo Peralta was convicted of felony assault resulting in bodily injury and involving family violence and burglary of a habitation. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §§ 22.01(a), 30.02(a) (West 2011); TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. §§ 71.0021, 71.005 (West 2008 & Supp. 2013). The trial court assessed punishment, following the revocation of appellant s community supervision, at ten years imprisonment on the assault case. The trial court assessed punishment at twelve years imprisonment on the burglary case. On appeal, appellant s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the records and counsel s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the records that might arguably support the appeals. We affirm the trial court s judgments. /David Lewis/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 130955F.U05 -2- Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT MIGUEL ARNOLDO PERALTA, Appellant No. 05-13-00955-CR Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F06-15900-H). Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis, Justices Fillmore and Evans participating. V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Based on the Court s opinion of this date, the trial court s judgment is AFFIRMED. Judgment entered June 18, 2014. /David Lewis/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE -3- Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT MIGUEL ARNOLDO PERALTA, Appellant No. 05-13-00956-CR Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F13-12202-H). Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis, Justices Fillmore and Evans participating. V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Based on the Court s opinion of this date, the trial court s judgment is AFFIRMED. Judgment entered June 18, 2014. /David Lewis/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE -4-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
