JANICE WALKER, Appellant v. DR. CHARLES R. CAIN, ROBERT J. SLACKNEY, NH TEXAS LTD PARTNERSHIP, STONEBRIDGE ALZHEIMER'S SPECIAL CARE UNIT, EMERITUS CORPORATION, AND SUMMER HAMMERLE, Appellees

Annotate this Case

DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 30, 2009
 
 
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
............................
No. 05-09-00401-CV
............................
JANICE WALKER, Appellant
V.
DR. CHARLES R. CAIN, ROBERT J. SLACKNEY, NH TEXAS LTD
PARTNERSHIP, STONEBRIDGE ALZHEIMER'S SPECIAL CARE
UNIT, EMERITUS CORPORATION, AND SUMMER HAMMERLE, Appellees
.............................................................
On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 08-11981
.............................................................
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Morris, O'Neill, and Fillmore
        On October 5, 2009, this Court granted appellant an extension of time to file her brief and ordered her to file her brief by November 16, 2009. We told appellant that because her brief was already overdue and due to the length of the extension granted, no further extensions would be granted. We further warned appellant that if she failed to file her brief by the date specified, we would, without further notice, dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(c). To date, appellant has not filed her brief. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.   See Footnote 1 
                                                          
090401F.P05                                                          PER CURIAM
 
Footnote 1 Doctors Home Visits is named as a defendant in appellant's original petition and is listed in the caption of appellant's notice of appeal. None of three orders from which appellant brought her appeal disposes of any claims against Doctors Home Visits. Further, we note the trial judge “administratively closed” the case in the trial court due to appellant having filed a notice of appeal. Therefore, although it is listed in the caption of the notice of appeal, Doctors Home Visits is not a party to the appeal before us.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.