KENNETH AVERY FARR, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

AFFIRM and Opinion Filed November 25, 2009
 
 
 
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
............................
No. 05-09-00060-CR
No. 05-09-00061-CR
............................
 
KENNETH AVERY FARR, Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 
.............................................................
On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F08-14292-UM, F08-59527-RM
.............................................................
 
MEMORANDUM OPINION
 
Before Justices Morris, O'Neill, and Fillmore
Opinion By Justice O'Neill
 
 
        Kenneth Avery Farr appeals from his convictions for forgery by check and theft enhanced by prior theft convictions. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes these appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response.
        We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals.
        We affirm the trial court's judgment in each case.
 
 
 
                                                          
                                                          MICHAEL J. O'NEILL
                                                          JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 47
090060F.U05