DANIEL ISAT RODRIGUEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

DISMISS; Opinion Filed May 26, 2009
 
 
 
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
............................
No. 05-09-00034-CR
............................
DANIEL ISAT RODRIGUEZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
.............................................................
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F08-24215-TY
.............................................................
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Wright, Bridges, and Francis
        Daniel Isat Rodriguez entered a negotiated guilty plea to retaliation. The trial court assessed the agreed punishment of three years' confinement and a $2,000 fine. As part of the plea agreement, appellant waived his right to appeal. See Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).
The trial court issued a rule 25.2(d) certification showing appellant has no right to appeal due to the plea bargain. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2.
        The record supports the trial court's certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614-15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Appellant entered into a plea bargain agreement and waived his right to appeal. The record does not contain any pretrial motions or rulings that would serve as a basis for appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (explaining analysis courts of appeal undertake in determining appellate rights of plea- bargaining defendants).
        The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We GRANT the State's motion.
        We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
 
 
                                                                  PER CURIAM
 
Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 47
090034F.U05