STEPHEN FRANCIS GENTRY A/K/A STEVEN FRANCIS GENTRY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

AFFIRM; Opinion issued October 28, 2009
 
 
 
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
............................
No. 05-08-00878-CR
............................
STEPHEN FRANCIS GENTRY A/K/A STEVEN FRANCIS GENTRY, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
.............................................................
On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court
Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 219-83159-06
.............................................................
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Morris, Bridges, and Murphy
Opinion By Justice Bridges
        A jury convicted Steven Francis Gentry   See Footnote 1  of possession with intent to deliver methamphetamine in an amount of four grams or more, but less than 200 grams, and assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment, probated for seven years, and a $10,000 fine. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response.
        We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.
        We affirm the trial court's judgment.
 
 
                                                          
                                                          DAVID L. BRIDGES
                                                          JUSTICE
 
Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 47
080878F.U05
 
Footnote 1 The indictment recites appellant's name as “Stephen Francis Gentry.” However, the record shows appellant signs his name as “Steven Francis Gentry.”