CHARLES ERIC WILLIAMS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Annotate this Case

AFFIRM; Opinion issued November 20, 2009
 
 
 
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
............................
No. 05-08-00234-CR
............................
CHARLES ERIC WILLIAMS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
.............................................................
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F06-27918-TK
.............................................................
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Richter and Fillmore
Opinion By Chief Justice Wright
        Charles Eric Williams waived a jury and pleaded guilty to possession with intent to deliver methamphetamine in an amount of four grams or more, but less than 200 grams. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(a), (d) (Vernon 2003). The trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, at twenty-five years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. Appellant filed a pro se response raising several issues.         We have reviewed the record, counsel's brief, and appellant's pro se response. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.
        We affirm the trial court's judgment.
 
 
                                                          
                                                          CAROLYN WRIGHT
                                                          CHIEF JUSTICE
 
Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 47
080234F.U05
 
 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.