Fred Gonzales v. State of Texas--Appeal from 266th District Court of Erath County

Annotate this Case


Order filed May 24, 2012

 

                                                                       In The

                                                                             

  Eleventh Court of Appeals

 

                                                                   __________

 

                             Nos. 11-12-00131-CR & 11-12-00136-CR

                                                    __________

 

                                     FRED GONZALES, Appellant

 

                                                             V.

 

                                      STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

                                   On Appeal from the 266th District Court

 

                                                            Erath County, Texas

 

                                                   Trial Court Cause No. CR13568

 

 

                                                                     O R D E R

 

            Fred Gonzales filed a notice of appeal from a judgment of conviction for the offense of possession of a controlled substance.  On May 15, 2012, this court received and filed the docketing statement and attached documents sent by the district clerk in our Cause No. 11-12-00131-CR.  On May 18, 2012, this court received and filed the docketing statement and attached documents sent by appellant's attorney.  Upon filing the second docketing statement, this court inadvertently gave it a new number, Cause No. 11-12-00136-CR.  We consolidate Cause No. 11-12-00136-CR into Cause No. 11-12-00131-CR for all purposes.  All future correspondence and filings should bear our docket number 11-12-00131-CR.

 

                                                                                                PER CURIAM

 

May 24, 2012

Do not publish.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Kalenak, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.