George William Solomon v. The State of Texas--Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 1 of Dallas County

11th Court of Appeals

Eastland, Texas

Opinion

George William Solomon

Appellant

Vs. No. 11-02-00328-CR B Appeal from Dallas County

State of Texas

Appellee

The jury convicted George William Solomon of felony driving while intoxicated. Appellant entered pleas of true to the enhancement allegations. The trial court assessed his punishment at confinement for 25 years. We affirm.

Appellant=s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which she states that she is unable to find any point of error that can be supported by the record. Counsel reviews the evidence presented and concludes that the evidence is both factually and legally sufficient. Counsel also examines the pretrial and jury selection proceedings and states that she can find no reversible error. Counsel also states that trial counsel provided reasonably effective assistance. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Hernandez v. State, 988 S.W.2d 770 (Tex.Cr.App.1999).

Counsel has furnished appellant with a copy of the brief and has advised appellant of his right to review the record and file a pro se brief. A pro se brief has not been filed. Counsel has complied with the procedures outlined in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex.Cr.App.1991); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Cr.App.1969).

Following the procedures outlined in Anders, we have independently reviewed the record. We agree that the appeal is without merit.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

September 25, 2003 PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX.R.APP.P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Arnot, C.J., and

Wright, J., and McCall, J.