Diomico Albert Galindo v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 176th District Court of Harris County

11th Court of Appeals

Eastland, Texas

Opinion

Diomico Albert Galindo

Appellant

Vs. Nos. 11-02-00053-CR & 11-02-00054-CR B Appeals from Harris County

State of Texas

Appellee

The trial court convicted appellant, upon his pleas of guilty, of the offenses of jumping his bail bond and failure to appear in Cause No. 11-02-00053-CR and of the offense of aggravated robbery in Cause No. 11-02-00054-CR. Pursuant to plea bargain agreements, the trial court assessed appellant=s punishment at confinement for 10 years in each case. Appellant filed general notices of appeal. We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.

The general notices of appeal do not comply with the requirements of TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(b)(3). The Court of Criminal Appeals has held that, where punishment is assessed pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, the notice of appeal must comply with Rule 25.2(b)(3) to invoke the appellate jurisdiction of this court. Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77 (Tex.Cr.App.2001).

The appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

November 14, 2002

Do not publish. See TEX.R.APP.P. 47.3(b).

Panel consists of: Arnot, C.J., and

Wright, J., and McCall, J.