Eric Flores v. Victor Parra and Joe SpencerAppeal from 383rd District Court of El Paso County (memorandum opinion by chief justice mcclure)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § ERIC FLORES, No. 08-14-00078-CV § Appellant, Appeal from § v. 383rd District Court § VICTOR PARRA AND JOE SPENCER, of El Paso County, Texas § (TC # 2014DCM0606) Appellees. § MEMORANDUM OPINION This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Finding that the severance order is an interlocutory order which is not appealable, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. It is well settled that appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgments, and such interlocutory orders as the Legislature deems appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corporation, 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); VNA, Inc. v. Figueroa, 403 S.W.3d 480, 481-82 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2013, no pet.); Ruiz v. Ruiz, 946 S.W.2d 123, 124 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1997, no pet.); TEX.CIV.PRAC. & REM.CODE ANN. § 51.014 (West Supp. 2013)(authorizing appeals from certain interlocutory orders). The appellant, Eric Flores, is attempting to appeal a severance order. Appellant filed a petition for injunctive relief in his parents divorce case purportedly claiming that he has an interest in his parents property.1 The trial court entered an order severing Appellant s petition for injunctive relief from the divorce. The severance order is an interlocutory order and there is no statutory provision authorizing an appeal from a severance order. Accordingly, the severance order is not appealable. On March 14, 2014, the Clerk of the Court notified the parties that the Court intended to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless any party could establish grounds for continuing the appeal. The notice required a response within ten days, but no response has been filed. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.3(a). May 30, 2014 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ. 1 The divorce proceeding is styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Javier Vensor Flores Senior and Cynthia Lorenza Flores (cause number 2014DCM0606). According to Appellant, the parties to the divorce are his parents. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
