In the Matter of O. G. R., a JuvenileAppeal from 65th District Court of El Paso County (opinion by chief justice mcclure)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-13-00173-CV § Appeal from IN THE MATTER OF O.G.R., A JUVENILE. § 65th District Court § of El Paso County, Texas § (TC # 06,00488) § OPINION O.G.R., a juvenile, appeals from an order committing him to the Texas Juvenile Justice Department. The juvenile court entered an adjudication order finding O.G.R. engaged in delinquent conduct by committing the offense of burglary of a habitation and placed him on juvenile probation. The State subsequently filed a motion to modify disposition alleging O.G.R. had violated the terms and conditions of the probation order. Following a hearing, the juvenile court found that the O.G.R. had violated the probation order and entered an order committing him to the Texas Juvenile Justice Department. We affirm. Appellant s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which she has concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by advancing one contention which counsel says might arguably support the appeal. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974). The procedures established in Anders apply to juvenile appeals. In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296, 297 (Tex. 1998); In re A.R.B., 225 S.W.3d 131, 132 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2005, no pet.). A copy of counsel s brief has been delivered to O.G.R., and he has been advised of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel s brief and agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. June 4, 2014 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.