In Re: Travis Coker--Appeal from of County

Annotate this Case
Criminal Case Template

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

 

IN RE: TRAVIS COKER,

 

Relator.

 

 

 

 

 

No. 08-03-00434-CR

 

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

 

IN MANDAMUS

 

OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

 

Relator Travis Coker seeks a writ of mandamus to compel an Ector County judge to rule on his motion for a free reporter's record of proceedings that occurred on August 14, 2002. He argues that these proceedings are relevant to his appeal, which is pending in this Court as Number 08-02-00014-CR.

We have jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus against judges of district or county courts in our district. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. 22.221(b) (Vernon Supp. 2003). We may issue the writ against other officials only if necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See id. Section 22.221(a). After Coker perfected his appeal, the Legislature removed Ector County from our district. See Act of May 29, 2003, 78th Leg., R.S., ch. 662, 1, 2003 Tex. Gen. Laws 2081, 2081 (to be codified as an amendment to Tex. Gov't Code Ann. 22.201(i) (Vernon 1988). Therefore, we may issue the writ against the trial judge only if necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Because a reporter's record is often necessary to the exercise of appellate jurisdiction, a court of appeals may issue a writ of mandamus to compel the completion of the reporter's record. See Wolters v. Wright, 623 S.W.2d 301, 305 (Tex. 1981).

In this case, however, we conclude that it is unnecessary to issue the writ to enforce our jurisdiction. If anything relevant is omitted from the reporter's record, we may direct the court reporter to file in this Court a supplemental reporter's record to cure the omission. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(d). Accordingly, we will deny the petition for writ of mandamus, but we will exercise our authority under Rule 34.6(d) to direct the court reporter to file a reporter's record from the August 14, 2002 proceedings.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

 

October 22, 2003

 

RICHARD BARAJAS, Chief Justice

 

Before Panel No. 4

Barajas, C.J., Larsen, and McClure, JJ.

 

(Do Not Publish)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.