Christopher Marcel LaFrance v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 384th District Court of El Paso County

Annotate this Case
COURT OF APPEALS

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CHRISTOPHER MARCEL LaFRANCE, )

) No. 08-03-00340-CR

Appellant, )

) Appeal from the

v. )

) 384th District Court

THE STATE OF TEXAS, )

) of El Paso County, Texas

Appellee. )

) (TC# 20030D01174)

)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Christopher Marcel LaFrance attempts to appeal from a judgment adjudicating him guilty of burglary of habitation. Appellant plead guilty to the offense on June 12, 2003, pursuant to a plea agreement with the State. The trial court followed the plea agreement and sentenced Appellant to fifteen years= imprisonment. Finding that Appellant has not complied with Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss the appeal.

Rule 25.2(a)(2) governs the defendant=s right to appeal in a criminal case. This rule provides in part:

 

A defendant in a criminal case has the right of appeal under Code of Criminal Procedure article 44.02 and these rules. The trial court shall enter a certification of the defendant=s right of appeal in every case in which it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order. In a plea bargain case--that is, a case in which defendant=s plea is guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant--a defendant may appeal only:

(A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or

(B) after getting the trial court=s permission to appeal.

Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(a)(2).

The rule also provides the following:

(d) Certification of Defendant=s Rights of Appeal. If the defendant is the appellant, the record must include the trial court=s certification of the defendant=s right of appeal under Rule 25.2(a)(2). The certification should be part of the record when notice is filed, but may be added by timely amendment or supplementation under this rule or Rule 34.5(c)(1) or Rule 37.1 or by order of the appellate court under Rule 34.5(c)(2). The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.

Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(d).

 

Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal but the notice did not include the trial court=s certification of the defendant=s right to appeal as required by Rules 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2(d). This Court notified Appellant=s counsel on August 8, 2003, that a certification had not been filed and requested that Appellant file an amended notice of appeal within thirty days or the appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d). See Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(d). By letter dated August 22, 2003, Appellant=s counsel informed this Court that the trial court was not presented with a certification form to sign pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(a)(2) because it was understood by all parties that Appellant did not have the judge=s permission to appeal.[1] Appellant=s counsel admits that Appellant has not complied with Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(a)(2). Further, Appellant=s counsel does not intend to file an amended notice of appeal and advises this Court to dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

September 25, 2003

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice

Before Panel No. 3

Barajas, C.J., Larsen, and Chew, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

 

[1] Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(a)(2) provides that A[t]he trial court shall enter a certification of the defendant=s right of appeal in every case in which it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order.@ We urge the trial courts in criminal cases to comply fully with Rule 25.2(a)(2) even when it is understood by all parties that the defendant does not have a right to appeal.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.