Kellie Johnette Holman v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 282nd District Court of Dallas County

Becker v. State COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
)

KELLIE JOHNETTE HOLMAN,

)
No. 08-02-00436-CR)

Appellant,

)
Appeal from)

v.

)
282nd District Court)

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

)
of Dallas County, Texas)

Appellee.

)
(TC# F-0160238-US)
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Kellie Johnette Holman appeals her conviction for delivery of a controlled substance. Appellant waived her right to a jury trial and entered a negotiated plea of guilty. The trial court found Appellant guilty and assessed her punishment in accordance with the plea bargain at a fine of $2,000.00 and imprisonment for a term of five years. We affirm.

Appellant's court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he has concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S. Ct. 2094, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1377 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). A copy of counsel's brief has been delivered to Appellant, and Appellant has been advised of her right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief, and agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. The judgment is affirmed.

 

July 31, 2003

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

 

Before Panel No. 2

Barajas, C.J., McClure, and Chew, JJ.

 

(Do Not Publish)