BLEDSOE, EARNEST MAURICE Appeal from 178th District Court of Harris County (other per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-83,513-01 EX PARTE EARNEST MAURICE BLEDSOE, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1191529-A IN THE 178TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY Per curiam. OPINION Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance, and was sentenced pursuant to Section 12.44(a) of the Texas Penal Code to sixty days’ county jail imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary and that his conviction violates due process because after he entered his plea, laboratory tests revealed that the evidence in this case contained no controlled substance. Applicant alleges that he was never advised of the laboratory test results, 2 and alleges that he would not have pleaded guilty to this offense had he known that the evidence did not support the charge. The parties have entered agreed findings of fact and conclusions of law, which the trial court has adopted. The trial court has determined that Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex parte Huerta, 692 S.W.2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985); Ex parte Mable, 443 S.W. 3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 1191529 in the 178th District Court of Harris County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Harris County to answer the charges as set out in the information. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. Delivered: July 29, 2015 Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
