CANTU, ROBERT Appeal from 175th District Court of Bexar County (other per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-82,642-01 & WR-82,642-02 EX PARTE ROBERT CANTU, Applicant ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 2008CR11211-W1 & 2008CR11212-W1 IN THE 175TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BEXAR COUNTY Per curiam. YEARY , J., not participating. OPINION Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two charges of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment in each case. The Fourth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Cantu v. State, Nos. 04-09-00521-CR & 04-09-00522-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio, May 5, 2010) (not designated for publication). Applicant contends that he is actually innocent and that material impeaching evidence was 2 withheld from the defense in violation of Brady v. Maryland.1 Specifically, he argues the defense was not made aware of misconduct on the part of arresting officers. In agreed findings of fact and conclusions of law, the trial court determined that relief should be granted under Brady, but that Applicant’s actual innocence claim under Schlup v. Delo2 is unavailing because the constitutional claim upon which it is based is not procedurally barred. Ex parte Villegas, 415 S.W.3d 885 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). We agree with the trial court. Relief is granted on the Brady claim. The judgments in Cause Nos. 2008CR11211 and 2008CR11212 in the 175th District Court of Bexar County are set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Bexar County to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. Delivered: April 1, 2015 Do not publish 1 373 U.S. 83 (1963). 2 513 U.S. 298 (1995).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
