DOUDS, KENNETH LEE Appeal from County Court at Law No 1 & Probate Court of Brazoria County (dissenting by judge meyers)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0857-14 KENNETH LEE DOUDS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS BRAZORIA COUNTY M EYERS, J., filed a dissenting opinion. DISSENTING OPINION While the majority holds that Appellant failed to preserve his Fourth Amendment complaint, I disagree. I believe that the court of appeals properly set out the law and that, once the defendant established that the search was conducted without a warrant, the burden became the State’s to show that the search was reasonable without a warrant. State v. Robinson, 334 S.W.3d 776, 778-79 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). It is the State’s burden to show why the warrantless blood draw was reasonable; not the defendant’s to prove that the Douds dissent - Page 2 warrantless action was unreasonable. Appellant had no burden to show lack of exigent circumstances, and he did not abandon his Fourth Amendment claim simply because the suppression hearing focused on Section 724.012 of the Texas Transportation Code. For these reasons, I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and, therefore, I respectfully dissent. Meyers, J. Filed: October 14, 2015 Publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
