Robinson v. Texas (original by judge keasler)
Annotate this CaseThe court of appeals affirmed appellant Leo Robinson's conviction for failing to report under the sex-offender registration requirements. The issue this case presented for the Court of Criminal Appeals' review centered on what degree of mental culpability the statute requires and whether to consider a trial judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law in a sufficiency of the evidence review. Upon review of the specific facts of this case, the Court held that a conviction under Article 62.012 required knowledge or recklessness only to the duty-to-register element of the offense, and that an appellate court should disregard the trial judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law in reviewing for sufficiency of the evidence. The Court affirmed the court of appeals’ opinion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.