EX PARTE JAY ANTHONY NOTTINGHAM AKA JEFFERY ANTHONY MONTGOMERY, Applicant (Other)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-29,898-03 EX PARTE JAY ANTHONY NOTTINGHAM AKA JEFFERY ANTHONY MONTGOMERY, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 12,337-B IN THE 181 ST DISTRICT COURT FROM RANDALL COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of robbery and sentenced to two years imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. Though he concedes that he has discharged the sentence, Applicant alleges that the conviction has been used to enhance another prison sentence which he is currently serving. Ex parte Harrington, 310 S.W.3d 452 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). Applicant contends, inter alia, that his plea was involuntary because trial counsel did not 2 perform an adequate independent investigation into the State s allegations. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall obtain a response from Applicant s trial counsel responding to Applicant s claims that counsel s ineffectiveness rendered his plea involuntary. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant s claim that his plea was involuntary because counsel did not conduct a thorough investigation before advising Applicant to plead guilty. The trial court shall make specific findings of fact addressing whether counsel discovered that one of the State s primary witnesses was unwilling to testify and that authorities had destroyed a videotape that allegedly portrayed the perpetrator of the crime entering and leaving the store. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant s claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all 3 affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: April 25, 2012 Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.