QUENTEZ BROWN, Relator v. DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent (Other)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-76,845-01 QUENTEZ BROWN, Relator v. DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NOS. 09-71466-T; 09-71467-T; 09-71468-T IN THE 283RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed applications for writs of habeas corpus in the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the applications have not yet been forwarded to this Court. This Court held this application and ordered the District Clerk to respond. He has sent a letter stating that the clerk s office sent the file to the trial court on May 12, 2011 and the trial court has failed to return the file after requests from the District Clerk. The trial judge responded to this letter, stating that prior to the District Clerk s letter, he had not been aware of such habeas applications and he has no record of ever receiving the writ files from the District Clerk. These two responses are in direct conflict with each other. A live hearing is necessary to resolve this conflict. The Presiding Judge of the First Administrative Judicial Region shall assign a judge to hold a live hearing regarding the whereabouts of Relator s writ applications. At the hearing, the assigned judge shall obtain the testimony of the Honorable Rick Magnis, Judge of the 283rd Judicial District Court, the Honorable Gary Fitzsimmons, District Clerk of Dallas County, attorney Jennifer Balido, and any other witnesses the judge believes necessary to resolve the issue. The judge holding the hearing shall enter findings of fact regarding whether the district clerk s office forwarded the record to the trial court and the whereabouts of Relator s habeas applications. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 30 days of this order. No continuances will be granted. A supplemental transcript containing all the transcription of the court reporter s notes from the hearing, along with the court s findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 60 days of the date of this order. Filed: March 28, 2012 Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
