DANIEL RAY MORRIS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS (Dissenting)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD 0796 10 DANIEL RAY MORRIS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPELLANT S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE ELEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND COUNTY M EYERS, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which P RICE and W OMACK, JJ., joined. DISSENTING OPINION The court of appeals said that under the record in this case, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting testimony regarding Appellant s grooming of the victim. Appellant contends that the court of appeals based this determination on the purported expert s experience, rather than whether grooming is a legitimate field of scientific examination. The majority disagrees and takes judicial notice that grooming is sufficiently established as a subject of expert testimony. Judge Cochran concurs that Morris dissent Page 2 grooming is a legitimate issue for expert testimony, but says that this type of expertise is experiential and is not related to scientific reliability. Irrespective of whether the study of grooming behavior is a legitimate field of expertise, I do not think Hullum was qualified to be an expert on this issue. He had no degree in any field of study involving human behavior, no specialized training in grooming behavior, and he did not show that the training and experience he did have enabled him to distinguish such behavior. His testimony that he believed Appellant engaged in grooming behaviors expressed to the jury his opinion as to Appellant s guilt. Allowing him to testify was error and, although we did not grant Appellant s ground for review regarding harm, I would say that the error was harmful. I respectfully dissent. Meyers, J. Filed: December 7, 2011 Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.