EX PARTE RANDALL LOUIS MCCOY (other)

Annotate this Case
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

 

NO. AP-76,443


EX PARTE RANDALL LOUIS MCCOY, Applicant

 

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. B-16,777A IN THE 173RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM HENDERSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

 

O P I N I O N

 

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to escape and was sentenced, pursuant to a plea agreement, to five years imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his plea agreement was breached because he is not receiving all the pre-sentencing jail time credit he was awarded on the judgment. The specific amount of pre-sentencing jail time credit was an affirmative element of the plea agreement in this case. The amount of time with which Applicant was to be credited was more than the time he spent in jail on this particular charge, although Applicant may have been in jail pursuant to another charge that was taken into consideration in sentencing for this case. The Texas Department of Criminal Justice cannot give Applicant credit for jail time served prior to the commission of the offense for which he is presently incarcerated. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.03 2(a). Applicant s plea bargain is unenforceable, and the State agrees that he is entitled to relief.

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. B-16,777 in the 173rd Judicial District Court of Henderson County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Henderson County to answer the charge against him.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

 

Delivered: November 3, 2010

Do Not Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.