EX PARTE RAMIRO HERNANDEZ a/k/a RAMIRO HERNANDEZ LLANAS (other)

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 
OF TEXAS 

WR-63,282-03 
EX PARTE RAMIRO HERNANDEZ a/k/a RAMIRO HERNANDEZ LLANAS 
ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. A97-364 IN THE 216th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT 
KERR COUNTY 
Per Curiam. HERVEY, J., not participating.
O R D E R

This is a subsequent application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.071, 5.

Applicant was convicted of the offense of capital murder in February 2000. The jury answered the special issues submitted under Article 37.071 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. This Court affirmed Applicant's conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Hernandez v. State, No. AP-73,776 (Tex. Crim. App. December 18, 2002). This Court denied Applicant's initial post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Hernandez, WR-63,282-01 (Tex. Crim. App. September 10, 2008). This Court dismissed Applicant's second post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to the abstention doctrine. Ex parte Hernandez, WR-63,282-02 (Tex. Crim. App. November 25, 2009). Applicant's instant post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus was received in this Court on February 8, 2010.

The record reflects that Applicant is currently challenging his conviction in Cause No. SA-08-CA-805-XR, styled Ramiro Hernandez a/k/a Ramiro Hernandez-Llanas v. Rick Thaler, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division. The record also reflects that on January 15, 2010, the federal district court signed an order staying its proceedings for Applicant to return to state court to consider his current unexhausted claims. Therefore, this Court may exercise jurisdiction to consider this subsequent state application. See Ex parte Soffar,143 S.W.3d 804 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Applicant presents four allegations in the instant application. We have reviewed the application, and we find that the allegations fail to satisfy the requirements of Article 11.071, 5(a). Accordingly, the application is dismissed as an abuse of the writ. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 11.071, 5(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH, 2010.

Do Not Publish