EX PARTE DORAN BLACHARD BOWSIER (other)

Annotate this Case
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 
OF TEXAS 

NOS. WR-72,905-01 AND WR-72,905-02 
EX PARTE DORAN BLACHARD BOWSIER, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NOS. 09-2-8002 AND 09-2-8003 IN THE 24TH DISTRICT COURT 
FROM JACKSON COUNTY 
Per curiam.O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two possession of a controlled substance in drug free zone offenses and sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment for each offense. He did not appeal his convictions.

Applicant alleges that his pleas were involuntary because the facts did not support charges for possession of a controlled substance in a drug free zone. Specifically, Applicant alleges that he possessed these controlled substances in Jefferson County Detention Center, which did not qualify as a drug free zone by law. Applicant alleges that counsel "misrepresented the facts" and induced him to plead guilty to invalid charges. He also alleges that counsel informed him if he did not accept the plea offer for 10 years' confinement, the State would increase the offer to 25 years' confinement. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, 3(d) to resolve the fact issues. In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. The trial court shall order trial counsel to file an affidavit addressing the following: (1) whether counsel's pre-trial investigation showed that the facts supported charges for possession of a controlled substance in a drug free zone; (2) whether counsel informed Applicant that accepting the plea offer for 10 years' confinement was in his best interest, and if so, why; and, (3) whether counsel advised Applicant as to all his options, including his right to go to trial. The trial court shall also instruct the clerk to supplement the record with a copies of the plea papers in these causes, including the trial judge's written admonishments, any written waivers, and Applicant's judicial confession.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant's claim that his plea was involuntary because counsel was ineffective. Specifically, the trial court shall make finding of fact as to whether counsel's pre-trial investigation showed that the facts supported a charge for possession of a controlled substance in a drug free zone. The trial court shall also make findings of fact as to whether counsel informed Applicant that accepting the plea offer for 10 years' confinement was in his best interest. The trial court shall also make findings of fact as to whether counsel advised Applicant as to all his options, including his right to go to trial. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: November 18, 2009

Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.