CARLOS LANDRIAN v. THE STATE OF TEXAS (concurring)

Annotate this Case
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS

NO. PD-1561-07
CARLOS LANDRIAN, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF
CASE 01-05-00697-CR OF THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS
HARRIS COUNTY
Womack, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Keller, P.J., and Keasler, J., joined.

Without implying that there is anything wrong with the Court's analysis of the jury-unanimity issue, I should like to point out that there is no possibility of a non-unanimous verdict for this offense as it was alleged. If half the jury believed the defendant caused serious bodily injury, then they necessarily believed that a deadly weapon was used. A deadly weapon is anything that in the manner of its use was capable of causing serious bodily injury. See Penal Code section 1.07(a)(17)(B). It is impossible to inflict serious bodily injury without using a deadly weapon. We so held only a couple of months ago. See Blount v. State, 257 S.W.3d 712 (Tex. Cr. App. 2008).

Filed October 8, 2008.

Publish.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.