MURRAL GLEN TADYCH v. THE STATE OF TEXAS (other)

Annotate this Case
Texas Judiciary Online - HTML Opinion     Close This Window

span.WPParaBox { padding: 0px; width: 100%; margin: 0px; display: block } div.WPParaBoxWrapper { padding: 0px; float: left } p { margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1px } hr { height: 0.0125in; background-color: black } body { font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal }








IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. PD-0107-08



MURRAL GLEN TADYCH, Appellant

                  


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS



ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HARRIS COUNTY



                        Per curiam. Keasler, and Hervey, JJ., dissent.


O R D E R


           The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) and 68.5 because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appeals and the petition exceeds fifteen pages.

           The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

           The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed


in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order.


En banc

Delivered: August 20, 2008

Do Not Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.