EX PARTE DARREN LESHON HARRIS (original)

Annotate this Case
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

 

NO. AP-75,916


EX PARTE DARREN LESHON HARRIS, Applicant

 

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W02-72607-Q(B) IN THE 204TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

 

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and sentenced to twenty-five years imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Harris v. State, No. 05-03-00261-CR (Tex. App. Dallas, delivered October 18, 2004, pet. ref d).

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because she failed to object to the failure of the court to follow a sentencing agreement between the parties. The trial court recommends granting relief. This Court does not find sufficient evidence in the record to support a finding that counsel was ineffective. However, the record does show that Applicant unknowingly waived his right to a sentencing hearing pursuant to an agreement which was vague and the terms of which had changed from the time of agreement to the time of sentencing. We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to relief.

Relief is granted. The sentence in Cause No. F02-72607 (Q) in the 204th Judicial District Court of Dallas County is vacated, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Dallas County to allow the trial court to sentence Applicant to any term of years within the applicable punishment range. Applicant s other claims are denied.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: May 14, 2008

Do Not Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.